How the sciences of quantum electrodynamics, near-death experiences, biocentrism, and the sciences of consciousness survival have already replaced Newtonian materialism (at least for those scientists with the intellectual honesty and scientific rigor to examine the extensive and overwhelming data and to pay attention to what it means). By Dr. Alan Ross Hugenot, Engr.Sc.D. (c)2016 With Foreword by Dr. Gary Schwartz, Ph.D. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force... We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter. Max Planck 1900 I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness. Max Planck - As quoted in The Observer (25 January 1931) Today, there is a new convergence of physics, biology, and spirituality, all pointing to the scientific reality of consciousness survival in a non-religious afterlife. The reason for this metaparadigm shift is because quantum electrodynamics, formalized in 1934 and mathematically proven since 1965, has shown materialism to be entirely false in its very foundational First Principles. The proof of non-locality in 1996 and its replication a dozen times since has reconfirmed that materialism is entirely false, further showing that consciousness is indeed the matrix of the universe. This is just as Max Planck postulated that it must be back in 1900. Scientifically, materialists can no longer ignore that consciousness exists outside the physical. Our individual consciousness is an integral part of the matrix upon which our material reality is built, and so our individual consciousness is itself eternal. If you think all of this through, it becomes evident that our most proven theory in all of science, quantum electrodynamics, requires consciousness survival, as pointed out by John von Neumann. Rigorous science (actually looking at all the data) brings one to this inevitable conclusion.
Therefore, anyone choosing not to believe these facts, regardless of how scientific they may claim to be, is simply foolish. Although many Materialist scientists fearfully still hold to the 350-year-old religion of Materialism (and a religion is any belief system not backed up by scientific facts), it is now time to drop the comfortable certainty of the archaic Materialist belief system (